Indicators of Compromise vs Indicators of Attack: What’s the Difference?


Updated on:

I often get asked about the difference between Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Indicators of Attack (IoAs). The truth is, these terms can be confusing, even for those familiar with the industry. It’s important to understand the difference between the two concepts, as they play a crucial role in identifying and mitigating security threats. In this article, I will break down the nuances of IoCs and IoAs, using psychological and emotional hooks to keep you engaged and informed. So, buckle up and let’s get into it!

What is the difference between indicator of compromise and indicator of attack?

Both indicators of compromise (IOCs) and indicators of attack (IOAs) are vital tools in detecting and mitigating cyber-attacks, but they have different purposes and applications. IOCs are used to identify signs of past security breaches or hacks, while IOAs are used to predict, prevent, and quickly respond to ongoing or imminent attacks.

To further illustrate the difference between IOCs and IOAs, the following are some points to consider:

  • IOCs provide insight into threat actors’ tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used in previous attacks, helping security professionals understand how the attack happened, what data or system was compromised, and how to remediate the issue.
  • IOAs, on the other hand, are proactive security measures that detect anomalous or malicious activities that may precede or accompany an attack. IOAs constantly monitor network traffic, user behavior, and system logs to identify suspicious behavior and patterns, and alert security teams to take actions to prevent the attack or minimize the impact.
  • IOCs are usually derived from known threat intelligence sources, such as public or private threat databases, and are static signatures that indicate a specific malware or an attack vector used in previous attacks. Conversely, IOAs are more dynamic and context-specific, derived from a thorough understanding of the organization’s assets, dependencies, and vulnerabilities.
  • IOCs are often used in forensic investigations or incident response activities, to identify the scope and impact of a potential security incident. IOAs, on the other hand, are used in real-time monitoring and alerting, to prevent security incidents or minimize their impact before damage occurs.
  • In conclusion, IOCs and IOAs serve different but complementary purposes in the cybersecurity landscape. While IOCs can help us understand what happened in the past, IOAs aid in identifying and preventing ongoing and future cyberattacks. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to use both these tools in a comprehensive security strategy, to minimize the risk of cyber-attacks and protect their critical assets.

    ???? Pro Tips:

    1. Know the purpose: IOCs (indicators of compromise) are used to identify possible security threats that have already infiltrated the system while IOAs (indicators of attack) are utilized to detect ongoing or potential security threats.
    2. Look for patterns: IOCs are identified by looking for patterns of behavior or characteristics that are associated with known threats, such as unusual network traffic or system modifications.
    3. Analyze metadata: IOAs on the other hand are identified using metadata such as the source and destination IP addresses, timestamps, and other relevant data.
    4. Combine techniques: Although they are different, IOCs and IOAs should be used in conjunction with each other to provide comprehensive and proactive security measures.
    5. Stay informed: Keep yourself updated on the latest threat intelligence to be able to quickly identify potential IOCs or IOAs and take action before the damage is done.


    As technology advances, cyber threats continue to evolve, and organizations must be vigilant in detecting any illicit activity in their networks. One way to accomplish this is through utilizing Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) and Indicators of Attack (IOAs). Although IOCs and IOAs can aid in identifying security incidents, they serve different purposes. In this article, we will explore the differences between IOCs and IOAs, provide real-world examples, and discuss the importance of leveraging IOAs in proactive detection.

    Understanding Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

    IOCs are traces of evidence left behind by a threat actor attempting to gain unauthorized access or perform malicious activities within a network. These traces can be anything from an IP address, file names, and registry keys. IOCs are retrospective in nature, meaning they aid in answering questions like “What happened?” after a security incident has occurred. Analysts can use these IOCs to correlate, investigate, and respond to a threat.

    Some common examples of IOCs include:

    • Malware hashes
    • File names and paths
    • Registry keys
    • IP addresses and domains
    • Malicious URLs
    • Behavioral patterns

    IOCs serve as a triage mechanism for investigating an incident response, but they do not provide a full picture of the attack.

    Understanding Indicators of Attack (IOAs)

    IOAs are a proactive approach to identifying security incidents or threats in the quickest time possible. Rather than focusing on the traces left behind by a threat actor, IOAs focus on the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by the attacker. IOAs are more strategic and can help answer questions such as “What is happening and why?”.

    Some common examples of IOAs include:

    • External to internal network traffic
    • Credential abuse attempts
    • Malicious email attachments
    • Insider threats
    • Phishing emails
    • Unauthorized access attempts
    • Lateral movement within the network

    IOAs aim to detect security incidents while they are still in progress and can help in preventing an attack from fully executing.

    Key Differences between IOCs and IOAs

    The key difference between IOCs and IOAs is in their purpose. IOCs are retrospective in nature and are used to provide insight into an ongoing or past attack. IOAs, on the other hand, focus on detecting attacks while they are still happening or in their early stages. IOCs are useful for correlating and investigating an incident, while IOAs are more strategic in nature and can help organizations respond to an ongoing attack in real-time.

    Another difference is in their effectiveness. IOCs rely on specific identifiers, which may not always be present in an attack. Conversely, IOAs focus on the attacker’s behavior, which is more difficult to conceal. While IOCs can provide valuable insights into an attacker’s tactics, IOAs give more comprehensive information that can be used to build effective defense strategies.

    Importance of Leveraging IOAs in Proactive Detection

    By leveraging IOAs in addition to IOCs, organizations can adopt a proactive approach to detecting security incidents. This approach allows for early detection and an improved response time, which can reduce the potential damage of an attack considerably. The understanding of attacker behavior forms the foundation for detecting threats, and therefore it is essential to implement IOAs into a security strategy.

    The use of IOAs helps organizations to:

    • Detect threats while they are still in progress
    • Prevent attacks from succeeding entirely
    • Gain a broader understanding of the threat landscape
    • Improve identification and reporting of threats
    • Develop effective defense strategies by understanding the attacker’s techniques and procedures

    Real-World Examples of Using IOCs and IOAs

    IOCs and IOAs have played essential roles in identifying and stopping cyber-attacks in many organizations. The WannaCry ransomware attack is an excellent example of how IOCs were leveraged to detect and contain the malware. Researchers were able to identify specific hashes and patterns that were unique to WannaCry and utilize them to identify infected computers.

    On the other hand, IOAs were instrumental in identifying a supply-chain attack on software provider SolarWinds. The attackers bypassed standard defenses by leveraging trusted software updates to infect thousands of organizations. By understanding the IOAs of the attacker, security teams were able to identify suspicious network behavior and limit the extent of the breaches.


    In conclusion, both IOCs and IOAs serve as valuable techniques for identifying security incidents. While IOCs help in correlating and investigating a threat, IOAs provide a proactive means of identifying active threats and implementing quick responses. Implementing both into a security strategy for an organization will provide a comprehensive approach to detecting and mitigating security incidents proactively and efficiently.