What are the two key methods for analyzing malware?

adcyber

Updated on:

I’ve seen my fair share of malware. It’s incredibly unsettling to think that something as intangible as lines of code could wreak so much havoc on our digital lives. That’s why understanding how to analyze malware is so important. It allows us to decipher the code and uncover the attacker’s intentions.

There are two key methods for analyzing malware: static analysis and dynamic analysis. Both methods have their strengths and weaknesses, but when used together, they can provide a comprehensive view of the threat. Let’s dive into each method and explore how they work.

What are the two common technique for malware analysis?

Malware is a constantly-evolving threat that can cause significant harm to computer systems and networks. To combat this threat, there are several techniques for malware analysis, two of which are static analysis and dynamic analysis.

  • Static Analysis: This is a basic type of analysis that does not need to be actually executed. It involves examining the structure and behavior of a malware sample without actually executing it. This is accomplished by analyzing the code, headers, libraries, and other elements of the malware file. Static analysis can help identify characteristics of the malware, such as its type, origin, and potential impact on systems.
  • Dynamic Analysis: This method involves actually executing the malware sample in a protected environment to observe its behavior. Dynamic analysis is important because it can reveal details that are not apparent from static analysis. For example, it can identify any network connections the malware tries to make, files it attempts to modify or delete, or any other malicious actions it attempts to perform. This technique allows analysts to observe the live behavior of malware, which can provide valuable insights into the malware’s functionality.
  • A hybrid analysis method is also commonly used, which includes both the static and dynamic analysis techniques above. This method provides both the high-level perspective from the static analysis and a low-level view of the malware actions from dynamic analysis. These techniques are essential for malware detection, triage, and incident response, as well as for threat hunting and malware research. By understanding how to properly analyze malware, security professionals can better protect computer systems and networks from cyber threats.


    ???? Pro Tips:

    1. Static Analysis: This technique involves examining the code of a malware without executing it. It allows for the identification of patterns and signatures that can help identify the malware’s behavior and origin.

    2. Dynamic Analysis: This technique involves running the malware in a controlled environment to observe its behavior, such as its communication with remote servers and its attempts to modify system files. Dynamic analysis helps to identify the malware’s capabilities and the extent of its impact on the system.

    3. Use Automation Tools: Malware analysis can be a time-consuming task. Using automated tools such as sandboxes can help rapidly investigate the behavior of unknown files.

    4. Keep your Tools updated: Malware authors are constantly trying to evade detection by updating and modifying their code. It is crucial to keep your tools updated to detect and analyze the latest malware variants.

    5. Collaborate with the Cybersecurity community: Collaborating with other cybersecurity professionals can provide valuable insights, tips, and techniques for malware analysis. It can help to open channels for sharing intelligence and identifying potential threats.

    Static Analysis: The Basic Type of Malware Analysis

    Static analysis is the essential technique for malware analysis that does not require running the malware. The primary objective of static analysis is to detect and identify the malware based on its static properties, such as the code structure, API calls, and file characteristics. Security experts use a range of tools like disassemblers, debuggers, and binary analyzers to carry out static analysis. By analyzing the malware’s components, like its payload, configuration files, and the loading process, static analysis helps in recognizing the malware’s behavior.

    Static analysis is capable of providing key insights into the malware’s structure without running the malware. Additionally, using static analysis can reveal elements such as embedded code and hidden data and structures, which may be missed by other analysis methods. Commonly in static analysis, security professionals use tools to analyze the metadata, binary code, and other properties of the malware code to classify it and perform subsequent investigations.

    The purpose of static analysis is to reveal the malware’s structure without executing it. Static analysis helps identify malware families and find attack patterns. This type of analysis can also detect malicious code designed to exploit system vulnerabilities that otherwise it would have gone unnoticed.

    Understanding Dynamic Analysis for Malware Detection

    Dynamic analysis, unlike static analysis, involves running the malware code in a controlled environment to observe its activity explicitly. Dynamic analysis helps in uncovering the malware’s behavior, like its network communication, system modifications, or file creations. Malware researchers use Virtual machines or sandboxing techniques to run malware and ensure that it does not spread into a host system.

    During dynamic analysis, malware experts often monitor the malware’s memory usage, resource consumption, and system calls. They also observe its reaction to specific conditions such as learning of the presence of security software. This is because malware authors would often create the code to evade detection by some security software. Dynamic analysis helps in identifying malware behavior in processes that static analysis may not capture.

    The Benefits of Hybrid Analysis

    Malware analysts combine static and dynamic analysis in hybrid analysis to obtain a comprehensive view of malware behavior. Hybrid analysis incorporates both static and dynamic analysis to detect malware and understand malware’s intent. By combining these two common methods, hybrid analysis can provide unique benefits.

    By using a combination of static and dynamic analysis in hybrid analysis allows for not only the identification of behavior but also the understanding of how the behavior is being achieved. It enables the isolation of malware that may have behaviors not discernible from static analysis, meaning that dynamic analysis can help identify behaviors that were missed during static analysis.

    Hybrid analysis can also provide an efficient method to detect malware through its multi-phased approach. In many cases, static analysis and dynamic analysis are performed on different stages of the malware analysis, with the results being fed back into one another to produce a more refined final result.

    Malware Detection: Keeping Your System Safe

    As malware becomes more complex, so too must the methods for detecting it. Malware can often disguise itself within other processes, or be contained within innocent-looking files leading to its ability to evade detection. The two primary types of malware detection techniques are anomaly-based detection and signature-based detection.

    Signature-based detection uses known malware signatures to scan and compare binaries for similarities, while anomaly-based detection uses a created baseline of “normal” network and user behaviors to detect unusual activity. Given the dynamic and evolving nature of malicious code, anomaly-based detection operates on the notion that anomalies in system or user activity are worth investigating, while signature-based detection helps to identify known malware threats based on their fingerprint.

    It’s important to note that no detection method will be 100% effective. Therefore, using a combination of detection theories with other security practices such as firewalls and access controls is fundamental in reducing the attack surface of any organization.

    Threat Alerts and Triage: Responding to Malware in Real-Time

    When an organization detects a potential threat, it is critical to deal with it accordingly. Many companies will have predetermined procedures in place which will isolate or contain the malware to prevent it from causing further damage. However, it is crucial to have a system in place for responding to threats to detect threats in real-time and prevent access to sensitive data or systems.

    Automatic threat alerts can make this process easier, by providing real-time notifications to security administrators the moment malware behaviors are detected. It is then the administrator’s responsibility to conduct a triage and assess the level of threat and determine the best strategy for dealing with the threat.

    Incident Response: Strategies for Dealing with Malware

    Having an efficient incident response system in place means that a response plan is in place, triage processes are in place, and the team of first responders is trained to take the necessary steps to mitigate the threat accordingly. Its efficacy is determined by how existent the procedures are, the triage mechanisms deployed, and the rapid response times.

    To develop an effective incident response system, companies can practice benchmarking exercises to identify system weaknesses and develop an incident response plan to counter these weaknesses. Additionally, investing in endpoint detection technology helps provide real-time information, enabling security professionals to isolate infected devices quickly and minimize the resulting damage.

    Threat Hunting: Proactively Protecting Your System

    Threat hunting involves proactively searching for potential threats and vulnerabilities within an organization’s environment. Rather than relying solely on traditional protection mechanisms, threat hunting employs a more proactive approach towards identifying potential security threats.

    Threat hunters use log analysis, network traffic data, and endpoint data to identify malicious activity within the organization’s environment. With the goal to identify and isolate threats before they can execute or cause damage.

    Threat hunting is not a single event but an on-going process that needs continuous monitoring and analyzing of security events. An organization that adopts a threat hunting mindset moves from being reactive to proactive, always looking for ways to improve its security posture.

    Conducting Effective Malware Research for Optimal Security

    Effective malware research starts with knowing the types of malware that are common and the techniques used to develop them. This knowledge helps analysts in identifying the threat and in crafting the best mitigation strategy. It’s also essential for analysts to remain up-to-date with emerging malware threats, as new variants are continually being developed.

    Using sandboxed environments and reverse engineering malware code are key techniques that malware analysts use to understand malware behavior. Reverse engineering can help security administrators dissect malware, subverting system calls, function calls, and assembly code. Sandbox techniques can help security personnel mimic attacks on isolated networks.

    In conclusion, analyzing malware is a vital component of maintaining security levels, and this analysis needs both static and dynamic approaches. Business and system administrators need to be constantly aware of the evolving landscape, and the threat posed by malware to ensure their organization’s security.